EACL 2028 deadline
The Annual Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Not announced yet. The dates below are projected from EACL 2027 (same dates, one year on). They will update here when the call for papers is out.
Paper submission deadline · ARR Submission
~10 months
- Anywhere on Earth
- ~Tue, Aug 3, 2027 · 23:59 AoE
- As published
- AoE
Key dates
ARR Submission: Full paper
~Tue, Aug 3, 2027 · 23:59 AoE
EACL commitment after ARR meta-reviews; reviewed papers only: Full paper
~Mon, Oct 11, 2027 · 23:59 AoE
What EACL reviewers will look for
EACL 2027 does not run its own reviewing: papers are reviewed in ACL Rolling Review and then committed to EACL, whose program chairs decide from the ARR reviews and meta-review. EACL 2027 (March 2027, special theme "The Human in Language") takes papers from the ARR August 2026 cycle or earlier; commitment closed on 11 October 2026. ARR reviews are about half a page. The form separates objective Soundness (must be justified in the text) from subjective Excitement, and the Overall Assessment is an outcome recommendation (Award / Conference / Findings / Resubmit), all on 1–5 with half points. Weaknesses are a numbered list specific enough for an AC to follow; suggested extra work goes under Comments. The guidelines list lazy-reviewing heuristics to avoid, e.g. "not novel" without a reference, "not SOTA", "simple method", "only tested on English", "I would have done X", or listing limitations the authors already acknowledge.
- Overall score
- Overall Assessment, 1–5 (top: “Consider for Award”)
- Sub-scores
- Soundness, Excitement, Reproducibility, Datasets, Software (1–5)
- Written fields
- Paper Summary · Summary Of Strengths · Summary Of Weaknesses · Comments Suggestions And Typos · Best Paper Justification · Limitations And Societal Impact · Ethical Concerns · Needs Ethics Review
- Author checklist
- Responsible NLP Research Checklist, 18 items
Where the bar sits. EACL has published a Findings of EACL volume since 2023. In the Overall Assessment, 4 ("Conference") argues for the main conference and 3 ("Findings") for the Findings of the ACL volume, which the program chairs may offer to committed papers that are sound but less exciting. ARR publishes no cutoff; venue senior ACs decide. Rule of thumb: average Overall Assessment ≥ 3.5 → main conference plausible, 3.0–3.5 → Findings, < 3.0 → likely rejected. Main conference acceptance is about 20–25%, plus ~13–15% Findings.
LLM policy for reviewers
ARR forbids using generative AI to create the first draft of a review or meta-review. Light language editing is allowed, but manuscripts and reviews must not be uploaded to non-privacy-preserving tools.
Official policy