reviewpaper.ai
NLPCORE A* · CCF B

EMNLP 2027 deadline

The annual Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

EMNLP 2026 site

Not announced yet. The dates below are projected from EMNLP 2026 (same dates, one year on). They will update here when the call for papers is out.

Paper submission deadline · ARR Submission

~7 months

Anywhere on Earth
~Tue, May 25, 2027 · 23:59 AoE
As published
AoE

Key dates

  1. ARR Submission: Full paper

    ~Tue, May 25, 2027 · 23:59 AoE

  2. Commitment deadline for papers with ARR reviews and meta-reviews: Full paper

    ~Mon, Aug 2, 2027 · 23:59 AoE

What EMNLP reviewers will look for

EMNLP 2026 does not run its own reviewing: papers are reviewed in ACL Rolling Review and then committed to EMNLP, whose program chairs decide from the ARR reviews and meta-review. EMNLP 2026 takes papers from the ARR May 2026 cycle (or earlier cycles); the target conference declared at ARR submission is binding, and commitment closed on 2 August 2026. ARR reviews are about half a page. The form separates objective Soundness (must be justified in the text) from subjective Excitement, and the Overall Assessment is an outcome recommendation (Award / Conference / Findings / Resubmit), all on 1–5 with half points. Weaknesses are a numbered list specific enough for an AC to follow; suggested extra work goes under Comments. The guidelines list lazy-reviewing heuristics to avoid, e.g. "not novel" without a reference, "not SOTA", "simple method", "only tested on English", "I would have done X", or listing limitations the authors already acknowledge.

Overall score
Overall Assessment, 1–5 (top: “Consider for Award”)
Sub-scores
Soundness, Excitement, Reproducibility, Datasets, Software (1–5)
Written fields
Paper Summary · Summary Of Strengths · Summary Of Weaknesses · Comments Suggestions And Typos · Best Paper Justification · Limitations And Societal Impact · Ethical Concerns · Needs Ethics Review
Author checklist
Responsible NLP Research Checklist, 18 items

Where the bar sits. EMNLP has published a Findings of EMNLP volume every year since 2020. In the Overall Assessment, 4 ("Conference") argues for the main conference and 3 ("Findings") for the Findings of the ACL volume, which the program chairs may offer to committed papers that are sound but less exciting. ARR publishes no cutoff; venue senior ACs decide. Rule of thumb: average Overall Assessment ≥ 3.5 → main conference plausible, 3.0–3.5 → Findings, < 3.0 → likely rejected. Main conference acceptance is about 20–25%, plus ~13–15% Findings.

LLM policy for reviewers

ARR forbids using generative AI to create the first draft of a review or meta-review. Light language editing is allowed, but manuscripts and reviews must not be uploaded to non-privacy-preserving tools.

Official policy
The full EMNLP review form, field by field

Deadline data from ccf-deadlines (MIT license), refreshed every 6 hours. We check the headline venues against their official calls for papers where we can, but deadlines move: always confirm on the official site before you plan around a date. “Estimated” dates are projected from the previous edition and are not announcements.

Times are shown in AoE (Anywhere on Earth, UTC−12) and in your local timezone. Spot an error? Report it upstream so everyone gets the fix.