NAACL 2027 deadline

Key dates

1. ARR Submission: Full paper

   Mon, Oct 12, 2026 · 23:59 AoE

2. ARR Submission: Author response ends

   Mon, Nov 30, 2026 · 23:59 AoE

3. NAACL commitment after ARR meta-reviews; reviewed papers only: Full paper

   Wed, Dec 23, 2026 · 23:59 AoE

4. NAACL commitment after ARR meta-reviews; reviewed papers only: Decisions

   Wed, Feb 10, 2027 · 23:59 AoE

5. Conference

   June 1-5, 2027 · San Francisco, California, USA

What NAACL reviewers will look for

NAACL 2027 does not run its own reviewing: papers are reviewed in ACL Rolling Review and then committed to NAACL, whose program chairs decide from the ARR reviews and meta-review. NAACL 2027 (San Francisco, June 2027) takes papers from the ARR October 2026 cycle, shared with COLING 2027; at commitment (deadline 23 December 2026) authors pick one primary venue and may opt in to be considered by the other. ARR reviews are about half a page. The form separates objective Soundness (must be justified in the text) from subjective Excitement, and the Overall Assessment is an outcome recommendation (Award / Conference / Findings / Resubmit), all on 1–5 with half points. Weaknesses are a numbered list specific enough for an AC to follow; suggested extra work goes under Comments. The guidelines list lazy-reviewing heuristics to avoid, e.g. "not novel" without a reference, "not SOTA", "simple method", "only tested on English", "I would have done X", or listing limitations the authors already acknowledge.

Overall score

Overall Assessment, 1–5 (top: “Consider for Award”)

Sub-scores

Soundness, Excitement, Reproducibility, Datasets, Software (1–5)

Written fields

Paper Summary · Summary Of Strengths · Summary Of Weaknesses · Comments Suggestions And Typos · Best Paper Justification · Limitations And Societal Impact · Ethical Concerns · Needs Ethics Review

Author checklist

Responsible NLP Research Checklist, 18 items

Where the bar sits. Recent NAACL editions (2022, 2024, 2025) published a Findings volume. In the Overall Assessment, 4 ("Conference") argues for the main conference and 3 ("Findings") for the Findings of the ACL volume, which the program chairs may offer to committed papers that are sound but less exciting. ARR publishes no cutoff; venue senior ACs decide. Rule of thumb: average Overall Assessment ≥ 3.5 → main conference plausible, 3.0–3.5 → Findings, < 3.0 → likely rejected. Main conference acceptance is about 20–25%, plus ~13–15% Findings.