reviewpaper.ai
NLPCORE A

EACL 2024 deadline

The Annual Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
March 18-20, 2024 · St. Julians, Malta (Hybrid)

Official call for papers

All deadlines for this edition have passed.

Key dates

  1. ARR Submission: Full paper

    Sun, Oct 15, 2023 · 23:59 AoE

  2. Commitment deadline for papers reviewed by ARR: Full paper

    Wed, Dec 20, 2023 · 23:59 AoE

  3. Conference

    March 18-20, 2024 · St. Julians, Malta (Hybrid)

What EACL reviewers will look for

EACL 2027 does not run its own reviewing: papers are reviewed in ACL Rolling Review and then committed to EACL, whose program chairs decide from the ARR reviews and meta-review. EACL 2027 (March 2027, special theme "The Human in Language") takes papers from the ARR August 2026 cycle or earlier; commitment closed on 11 October 2026. ARR reviews are about half a page. The form separates objective Soundness (must be justified in the text) from subjective Excitement, and the Overall Assessment is an outcome recommendation (Award / Conference / Findings / Resubmit), all on 1–5 with half points. Weaknesses are a numbered list specific enough for an AC to follow; suggested extra work goes under Comments. The guidelines list lazy-reviewing heuristics to avoid, e.g. "not novel" without a reference, "not SOTA", "simple method", "only tested on English", "I would have done X", or listing limitations the authors already acknowledge.

Overall score
Overall Assessment, 1–5 (top: “Consider for Award”)
Sub-scores
Soundness, Excitement, Reproducibility, Datasets, Software (1–5)
Written fields
Paper Summary · Summary Of Strengths · Summary Of Weaknesses · Comments Suggestions And Typos · Best Paper Justification · Limitations And Societal Impact · Ethical Concerns · Needs Ethics Review
Author checklist
Responsible NLP Research Checklist, 18 items

Where the bar sits. EACL has published a Findings of EACL volume since 2023. In the Overall Assessment, 4 ("Conference") argues for the main conference and 3 ("Findings") for the Findings of the ACL volume, which the program chairs may offer to committed papers that are sound but less exciting. ARR publishes no cutoff; venue senior ACs decide. Rule of thumb: average Overall Assessment ≥ 3.5 → main conference plausible, 3.0–3.5 → Findings, < 3.0 → likely rejected. Main conference acceptance is about 20–25%, plus ~13–15% Findings.

LLM policy for reviewers

ARR forbids using generative AI to create the first draft of a review or meta-review. Light language editing is allowed, but manuscripts and reviews must not be uploaded to non-privacy-preserving tools.

Official policy
The full EACL review form, field by field

Deadline data from ccf-deadlines (MIT license), refreshed every 6 hours. We check the headline venues against their official calls for papers where we can, but deadlines move: always confirm on the official site before you plan around a date. “Estimated” dates are projected from the previous edition and are not announcements.

Times are shown in AoE (Anywhere on Earth, UTC−12) and in your local timezone. Spot an error? Report it upstream so everyone gets the fix.