EACL 2024 deadline
The Annual Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
March 18-20, 2024 · St. Julians, Malta (Hybrid)
All deadlines for this edition have passed.
Key dates
ARR Submission: Full paper
Sun, Oct 15, 2023 · 23:59 AoE
Commitment deadline for papers reviewed by ARR: Full paper
Wed, Dec 20, 2023 · 23:59 AoE
Conference
March 18-20, 2024 · St. Julians, Malta (Hybrid)
What EACL reviewers will look for
EACL 2027 does not run its own reviewing: papers are reviewed in ACL Rolling Review and then committed to EACL, whose program chairs decide from the ARR reviews and meta-review. EACL 2027 (March 2027, special theme "The Human in Language") takes papers from the ARR August 2026 cycle or earlier; commitment closed on 11 October 2026. ARR reviews are about half a page. The form separates objective Soundness (must be justified in the text) from subjective Excitement, and the Overall Assessment is an outcome recommendation (Award / Conference / Findings / Resubmit), all on 1–5 with half points. Weaknesses are a numbered list specific enough for an AC to follow; suggested extra work goes under Comments. The guidelines list lazy-reviewing heuristics to avoid, e.g. "not novel" without a reference, "not SOTA", "simple method", "only tested on English", "I would have done X", or listing limitations the authors already acknowledge.
- Overall score
- Overall Assessment, 1–5 (top: “Consider for Award”)
- Sub-scores
- Soundness, Excitement, Reproducibility, Datasets, Software (1–5)
- Written fields
- Paper Summary · Summary Of Strengths · Summary Of Weaknesses · Comments Suggestions And Typos · Best Paper Justification · Limitations And Societal Impact · Ethical Concerns · Needs Ethics Review
- Author checklist
- Responsible NLP Research Checklist, 18 items
Where the bar sits. EACL has published a Findings of EACL volume since 2023. In the Overall Assessment, 4 ("Conference") argues for the main conference and 3 ("Findings") for the Findings of the ACL volume, which the program chairs may offer to committed papers that are sound but less exciting. ARR publishes no cutoff; venue senior ACs decide. Rule of thumb: average Overall Assessment ≥ 3.5 → main conference plausible, 3.0–3.5 → Findings, < 3.0 → likely rejected. Main conference acceptance is about 20–25%, plus ~13–15% Findings.
LLM policy for reviewers
ARR forbids using generative AI to create the first draft of a review or meta-review. Light language editing is allowed, but manuscripts and reviews must not be uploaded to non-privacy-preserving tools.
Official policy